U.S. Iranian Talks, Propoganda?
I doubt it, but the Iranian regime thinks so:
WASHINGTON - AP - The United States said Wednesday it would join in face-to-face talks with Iran over its disputed nuclear program if Tehran first agreed to put challenged atomic activities on hold, a shift in tactics meant to offer the Iranians a last chance to avoid punishing sanctions.
Iran dismissed the offer as “a propaganda move.”
This is part of the current regime’s broader effort to by time. The Iranians paid close attention to the way past presidents mis-handled the North Korean nuclear negotiations. And the Iranians, led by Ahmadinejad, are now playing the same game. In fact, they recently offered to restart nuclear talks with the U.S. (AFP):
VIENNA (AFP) - Iran offered to restart nuclear talks with the European Union but the EU and Washington were still pressing for sanctions if Tehran refuses to halt atomic work that could be weapons-related.
Six world powers were to meet in Vienna Thursday to bridge differences over offering Iran trade and other benefits in return for guarantees it will not make nuclear weapons, while still preparing for sanctions if Tehran does not comply, spokesmen in capitals confirmed.
But the Iranians are referring to today’s offer, by Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice, to conduct face-to-face talks as western propoganda. Should anyone be surprised?